Obama Bombed 5 Out Of 7 Countries Trump “Banned” — Media Didn’t Care

obwana

Maybe Obwana’s plan in bombing these countries was to create Muslim refugees to swamp the US.

“While the lying media is freaking out over President Trump’s travel ban for seven Middle Eastern countries deemed security risks, they didn’t give a damn about Obama.”

See:  Obama Bombed 5 Out Of 7 Countries Trump Banned — Media Didn’t Care by Chris Menahan

Nihad Awad Accuses Mohammed of Immorality

thK26AQD5U nihadth7HU2E6RK

In a press conference denouncing President Trump’s so-called “ban” on the mass importation of Muslim migrants, Hamas-CAIR’s national executive director Nihad Awad likened Pres. Trump’s action to slavery.

The Daily Caller asked Awad if refugees have a right to come to the United States, and CAIR’s communications director Ibrahim Hooper claimed that under international law refugees have “rights beyond what normal immigrants have.” Awad added that the issue isn’t one “of legality,” but of “morality.”

The CAIR executive director then equated refusing refugee entry to former American policies of slavery and women not being able to vote. He said those actions were legal but “wrong.”

It is surprising to hear a Muslim so publicly condemn the actions of Mohammed –the “perfect man” –and accuse him of immorality. But such is the case, as even a passing familiarity with the life of Mohammed reveals that he himself owned and traded in slaves, and advised his followers to do so.

He also specifically instructed his followers that it was perfectly all right to rape female captives –though it is true that there is no discussion of woman suffrage per se recorded.

The Quran actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves (4) than it does to telling them to pray five times a day (zero).

There is also a place in the Hadith which discusses an enslaved African owned by Mohammed:

 Sahih Bukhari (72:734) – Some contemporary Muslims in the West (where slavery is believed to be a horrible crime) are reluctant to believe that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad. In this case, the slave is of African descent.

Hard as it is to believe that Nihad Awad holds late 18th and early 19th century Americans to a higher moral standard than he does the Prophet of Allah, there you have it.

The CAIR representative also pointed out that he himself had entered the US as a refugee, though whether the information was intended as a threat, or as evidence in support  of President Trump’s action, was less clear.

Nihad didn’t get around to explaining in what way Pres. Trump’s moratorium on accepting refugees –whose religion commands them to make war on the infidel –constituted immorality, but he was probably too confused to be able to explain it to the dirty kuffars.

Gloria Steinem, Still Circling the Wagons

Image result for steinem at women's march

At the Women’s March last Saturday, one of the speakers was feminist icon Gloria Steinem.

You remember. She’s the one who, in the 1990’s, betrayed everything her life had stood for up to that moment to help circle the wagons around then-president Bill Clinton, accused rapist and groper, who had an affair with a White House intern and lied about it to Congress. Her “one free grope” doctrine made feminism a joke for the last couple of decades.

On Saturday, in a speech filled with lies, near-lies, and distortions, she had this to say:

[C]ollectively violence against females in the world has produced a world in which for the first time there are fewer females than males.

But we can be much more specific than that. It is not some random “violence” that has changed the male-to-female ratio on the planet. The sea change can be laid at the door of the People’s Republic of China, and their one-child policy.

In 1979, China began a policy limiting married couples of Han descent (91% of pop.) living in urban areas (51% of pop.) to one child only. Ethnic minorities and those in rural areas could apply for exemptions, and there were a few other exceptions made. The Chinese government hoped  thereby to achieve what famine and the cultural revolution could not: zero population growth.

The result was a frenzied effort to detect the sex of a fetus as early as possible, so that female fetuses could be quickly aborted. Those women who had the misfortune of bearing a girl child and became pregnant again in hopes of having a boy, or who simply wanted to have another child, were subject to forced abortion, and even sterilization. The number of abortions rose to five times that in the US, with an estimated 400 million abortions attributable to the policy.

Violations of the one-child policy could result in fines, loss of employment, and loss of government assistance –crucial in China’s controlled economy. So  there were a few other problems as well: abandonment, neglect, and infanticide of unwanted girls.

Feminists who support abortion rights harp on “choice” for a reason, the idea being to make motherhood voluntary, to leave the decision of whether or when –or how many times — to become a mother up to the woman.

The tragic coincidence of a millennia-old disdain for women in Chinese culture,  a coercive totalitarian government that denies the right of individuals to make their own life choices, and the technology to abort those with the undesirable trait of femaleness, has resulted in a “bachelor surplus” of about 30 million men in China.  Add to this the families that might have had several girls while trying for the treasured boy, and the loss of girls has had consequences for the global population.

The one-child policy was ended by China in October of 2015. They now have a two-child policy, which might actually exacerbate the problem.

The question is why the outspoken Gloria Steinem won’t hold a left-wing totalitarian regime responsible for its own crimes against women, even while she decries the effect of those crimes, and ironically  in the same speech insists on the right to abortion “without government interference.”

And why she condemns violence against women, but won’t name the source of unconscionable violence against women today, from enslavement, to rape, to acid attacks, to honor killings, to FGM ( hint: starts with “Is”, ends with “lam”).  She instead declares her solidarity with Muslims, and shares a stage with the anti-woman anti-semite sharia advocate Linda Sarsour.

As was apparent  during the Clinton debacle, “Democrat” and “feminist” are not synonyms, yet Gloria Steinem too often sees friends among the enemies of women.  When the current progressive agenda runs into conflict with feminism, feminists will be the first tossed aside.

Women’s Rights are Human Rights, and Islam Respects Neither

On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of women and men converged on Washington to protest the democratic election of Donald Trump, and his barely-begun presidency.

Many wore what they called a “pussyhat.”1485138661490

Western-style pussyhat:

thThe hat is pink, and has a clever design, so when it is placed on the head, it gives the effect of ears, like a pussycat. It also of course represents a slang and, to many, derogatory term for the female genitalia.

Compare the Islamic-style pussyhat:

niqab-1 I think most of us can agree that there’s nothing fun or clever about that. It is designed to remove women from the public sphere, to remind them and everyone else, that they are the private property of a man, who owns even the sight of them, which only he, as owner, is allowed to see.

The Western pussyhat alludes to a phrase used by Donald Trump in a private conversation with another man eleven years ago. He said, “grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything”–which is gross and rude, (not to mention a little perplexing), but not the silliest or stupidest thing one man has said to another when bragging about his success with women. It also betrays some surprise on his part at what women let him get away with because of his fame.

It is far different from the Islamic approach to pussy, which in its most extreme form involves cutting off the clitoris, and its hood, and the labia minora, then scraping raw the insides of the labia majora, and sewing them closed, with a stick inserted to form a single opening to allow the release of urine and menstrual blood.

It’s almost unbelievable, isn’t it?

The whole procedure is most often performed without anesthesia (think of that for a moment), or sanitary conditions. But even if done in a hospital, it is an irreversible mutilation and deprivation, which benefits the girl or woman in no way. Women who have been subjected to “excision and infibulation” have to be cut open to permit intercourse, and later childbirth, meaning that their living flesh is cut open and resewn repeatedly throughout their fertile lives.

There are less ferociously misogynistic forms of female genital mutilation (FGM). Some involve only lopping off the clitoris and the labia minora and most of the labia majora without scraping and sewing. Sometimes just the clitoris is cut off.  Sometimes just the tip of the clitoris is removed.

Can these practices be reconciled with feminism? with human rights?

There is a vast difference, an unfathomably vast difference, between cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood and cutting off the genitalia of the female population.

The Women’s March was infested with Islamic activists and apologists: CAIR, Linda Sarsour,  Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood supporters. Those who support human rights cannot make common cause with those who accept Islamic supremacy, FGM,  gender apartheid,  the religiously-mandated murder of  gays, sex slavery, child-rape, and the rest of the Islamist agenda.

Disaster Could Send CNN into Oblivion

 

A bombing or other deadly attack on CNN headquarters in Atlanta could send the much-derided fake news outlet into final and permanent oblivion.

While this writer knows of no specific threat to shoot up, bomb, firebomb, or otherwise destroy utterly, perhaps with a number of shoulder-launched multipurpose assault weapons,  or the simple expedient of automatic rifle fire, the world headquarters of the “Pravda of the South”, hey, who knows?

If the attack hit CNN just as the transfer of power at the inauguration is underway, it would mean more than a simple ratings disaster. I mean, amid the “chaos” and “high theater” who would be the designated survivor? And would there be one? And would anyone care? Or notice?

Does anyone care right now who runs the fake news network?

We already have a good handful of them, from ABSleaze, to NBSleaze, to SeeBS to PeeBS. How many lying leftist scum can one industry support, anyway?

Maxine Waters Won’t Stink Up the Inauguration

“Poverty Pimp” Maxine Waters declared she won’t be attending the Trump Inauguration, that she”[doesn’t] like him and [doesn’t] respect him”.

It is hard to exaggerate the comfort and reassurance Trump supporters experience at the news.

Maxine Waters, 78, is most notable for the multi-year ethics investigation of her, starting in 2010 when she was charged with violating House ethics rules. While the investigation failed to find sufficient evidence to convict her, it uncovered enough corruption to permanently taint her tenure in the House.

An L.A. area artists’  collective festooned her district with the pictured posters.

Not the sort of thing your average member of congress likes to encounter upon leaving their out-of-district mansion in the morning.

Rep. Waters is also famous for her support for the  implementation of Sharia law in the US. She believes that those who oppose sex slavery, child rape, and the imposition of the death penalty for homosexuality are bigots and fear-mongers.

Maxine Waters  believes the Russians came up with the phrase “Crooked Hillary”, and that Donald Trump should be impeached for using it.

Best wait until after the inauguration, Maxine.

Image result for maxine waters poverty pimp

 

John Lewis, Icon

                                                       I’m an icon

Rep. John Lewis, often described as a civil rights icon, is also an enemy of democracy, a malicious liar, a slanderer, a racist, and a friend to America’s enemies.

He is a hero for our times, famous not for what he has done, but for what was done to him. He was severely beaten and suffered a skull fracture at the Edmund Pettus bridge in Selma Alabama in 1965, in a confrontation between Alabama State Troopers and peaceful black protestors, in what became known as “Bloody Sunday.”

That’s why John Lewis knows it’s okay for him to insist that Donald Trump is not the legitimate president-elect.

Even though Director of National Intelligence James Clapper acknowleged that we do not know if the Russian hacks were at the State level, that “no one believes” they had any effect on the vote tally, and that “we have no way to gauge that”  in any event, John Lewis knows he can accuse the duly-elected next president of our country of being illegitimate,  democracy be damned.

That’s why he can accuse Tea-party members of calling him and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus “n*ggers” even though video of the alleged incident proves it never happened,  and then just go blithely on without explanation, embarrassment or apology.

That’s why he can boycott Netanyahu’s speech to Congress against lifting sactions on Iran. And can address Congress in support of “peace” and the Iran deal.

And that’s why he’s skipping the inauguration.

(Also not attending will be Maxine Waters, Yvette Clarke, Jerry Nadler, Mark Tekano, and Ted Lieu, and they’re still  passing around the sign-up sheet. It seem like the Democrats are practicing for when the only Democrats in DC work in the Mayor’s office.)

John Lewis knows that icons are never questioned, never challenged, never asked to account for their behavior, never expected to lose the chip on their shoulder, and always treated as if their every word contained the wisdom of the ages.

And never taken seriously as anything but an icon.