Rape Jihad in Israel

Two Arabs have been arrested and a third is being sought for the gang rape of a mentally and physically disabled Israeli woman. The three were said by police to have “nationalist” motives. The assault took place over Independence Day, and was preserved for posterity by the assailants.

Imad Al-Din Daraghmeh, 42, is accused of filming as he and two other attackers raped, urinated, and spit on the young woman – all while berating her with anti-Semitic slurs. He also allegedly threatened to murder her aunt and brother if she complained to the police.

The second Palestinian Authority Arab suspect arrested is underage and a third suspect escaped and remains at large.

“Nationalist” is the term used by Israeli police to distinguish terrorist attacks from those with a criminal motive.

News of the attack and the arrests was suppressed by the police for ten days with a “media gag order,” out of concerns that the information would “spark unrest.” An outraged Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said on Thursday

“This is a shocking crime that must be condemned across the board. But for some reason such a condemnation hasn’t been heard – not in the press and not across the political spectrum. . . .

“We can only imagine what would have happened if the tables were reversed,” suggesting that the outcry would have been stronger had Jewish men raped a disabled Palestinian woman.

As was the case following the New Years Eve migrant assaults in Europe, the attack has stirred debate in Israel, with Knesset members of the Left and Right accusing feminists of “silence,” and the police of possible negligence.

In a tiresomely familiar equivocation, journalist and feminist activist Nitzan Levenberg warned that the incident “shouldn’t be used to slander a specific group.”

“Those who did it are bad people regardless of their ethnicity  . . . The practice of expressing shock and outrage over violence against women only when the perpetrators are the ‘enemy’ exists all around the world . . .. It highlights the view of female sexuality as a tool of war, and such cases are used as a justification for bigoted and racist viewpoints.”

–and the practice of suppressing information about the ethnicity of the perpetrators lest the yahoos make racist generalizations exists wherever leftist elitists gather.

How is identifying the ethnicity of the perpetrators “slander”? They are members of the ethnic group they are members of. In a case where the perpetrators are shouting ethnic slurs at their victim, the ethnic element has already been introduced, and is at least part of the motivation for the attack. Had the victim been an Arab, she would not have been the victim.

But Nitzan Levenberg is also correct that ethnicity is not necessarily the motive. More likely religion –which is to say, the religion of the perpetrators –is becoming the reason for this sort of attack, as the jihad proceeds apace.


“This Girl Took a Selfie with Anti-Muslim Protesters” and Turned Out to be A Vicious AntiSemite

So 22-year-old Zakia Belkhiri and other Muslims decided to take selfies with them. Belkhiri told BuzzFeed News she took the pictures to show that "we can live together, not [just] next to each other, but with each other".

Actually, Zakia Belkhiri is a woman, aged 22 years –which in Islamic lands may prove old enough to be a grandmother.

On a recent holiday in Belgium, Belkhiri took selfies in front of a demonstration by about 40 members of the conservative Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) Party. The demonstation took place in Antwerp, site of a Muslim lifestyle expo that weekend. The Party members held signs protesting Halal slaughter and the wearing of hijab, as well as mass Muslim immigration generally.

They held signs that said “Stop Islam” and "No headscarf". The protesters also tried to hand out pork sausages to Muslims passing by.

Belkiri became a social media sensation, with admirers praising her “resistance to hate” and she herself claiming that

When I went to the Muslim Expo and I saw these people demonstrating I immediately thought of taking a selfie with them . . .

It was all a coincidence, nothing was planned, I didn’t even know there was a demonstration! In doing this non-violent action, I wanted to send a positive message and show these people that Muslims are peaceful people.

And now it has become apparent that the Peace Girl™ is in fact an admirer of Adolf Hitler, and posted a number of anti-Semitic tweets in 2012, and 2014, as well as similar comments on Facebook and Ask.fm. She has since deleted the posts, but screenshots show that the only peace this exemplar of Islam is interested in is the peace of the tomb –for select “Others,” of course.

Note that Belkiri doesn’t even bother to pretend that her problem is with Israelis or Zionists. It’s just unapologetic Jew hatred.

In another gem she reveals even more of her loving and peace-loving nature:

Yes, a toothsome blend of racist hatred, cynical self-promotion, and love of money. Or as she says, “I’d love to be an inspiring person, though I know I’m a bit idealistic”.


A neo-nazi site was quick to recognize one of their own:

The story gets better! Belkhiri is an active anti-Zionist! . . .

Zakia, if you happen to be reading this, please consider joining our movement:


Yet it was the Belgians holding the demonstration who were relentlessly characterized as far-right.



Depend on Depends

The Chicago Sun-Times  is reporting that a 33-year-old man has been arrested following a choking attack on an 8-year-old girl in a store bathroom. The incident, which occurred on May 7, was not reported by the newspaper until May 13.

The man allegedly choked the girl until she passed out inside the bathroom of a South Loop store. The girl was with her mother, and went alone to the bathroom.

The woman then heard a scream from her daughter and went inside to find 33-year-old Reese M. Hartstirn carrying the unconscious girl into a stall, police said. He had choked her with his hands . . ..

Other people in the store helped restrain the man until police arrived to arrest him.

It was unclear from the report whether the store had sex-segregated restrooms. Also unclear was the reason for the delay in reporting the item, though it might not have been deemed more than an item for the police blotter until Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s stump speech in support of men using the women’s bathroom, and vice-versa.

Our AG gave a speech which did not explain why the federal government is now in the business of regulating who uses the bathroom. The speech ranged broadly, claiming that men should use the women’s bathroom because the South used to have Jim Crow laws, and that trans-sexuals could use the potty of their choice no matter who is discomfited or inconvenienced, or nauseated, or has their privacy violated. The Left collectively wet itself over the speech, described as “impassioned”and “brilliant”. Amber Phillips, in both The Boston Globe and The Washington Post claimed that Lynch was now a “hero to transgender activists.”

Which may be so. But must we care?

Is this not one of those violations that no one knows –let alone cares –about, unless the miscreant makes a big public spectacle of it?

Which begs another question: Isn’t at least part of the goal of being transgender to pass unnoticed as a member of the other, or aspired to, or identified-with, sex?

I have seen no TSA-like official gropers at the entrances of public restrooms, and I doubt there are any plans to install them, even in North Carolina and Mississippi. In plenty of urban areas with a night-life that includes social drug use, people of both sexes can be found congregating in one or both restrooms- to the annoyance of those who just want to use the facilities. Not to mention the use of public restrooms  for sex or prostitution. Entering the verboten bathroom is hardly the March on Washington.

Loretta Lynch has dragged the federal government into the fray because she is a belligerent Leftist activist who can’t rein-in her embarrassing power trip, and loves to break bad on those who dare take a different view from her own, whether they be climate skeptics, coal miners, those who call a Muslim terrorist a Muslim terrorist, or people who expect a little privacy in the restroom. Her DOJ is now in a pissing contest with North Carolina, with suits and counter-suits filed.

Lynch is also embarked on a one-woman re-interpretation of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, with an eye to denying federal funding to schools and colleges that dare defy her. She insists on conflating “sex” of which there are two, with “gender” of which Facebook recognized 56 at last count. So now a law designed to protect equality for women at federally-funded institutions is being used to blackmail states into toeing the transgender line.

Meanwhile back at the mall, it was bad enough that women had to put up with having the changing station in the women’s restroom (alas for the hapless dad who needs to change  his infant son or daughter). Or with the occasional 10 or 12-year-old boy whose mother is afraid to leave him alone outside. Now we’ll have a procession of gentlemen in wigs and skirts traipsing into the ladies’ and taking over all the mirrors to fix their make-up. Or maybe just the occasional would-be rapist or child-molester lurking in the privacy of the one public area outfitted with locks on the doors.



No Hijab at The Citadel


The Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina, has denied a prospective student’s request to wear hijab instead of the cadet uniform. The school had considered the request for nearly a month, but in the end decided that even cadets blessed with Muslim privilege  have to wear the uniform.

The Citadel has a long tradition of denying requests to modify or supplement the cadet uniform, reasoning that variation is ipso facto not uniform.

At the Citadel, students are expected to leave behind their individuality — and almost all of their possessions — and form opinions [sic] based on character rather than appearance. Allowing one student to wear something completely different struck many as antithetical to that mission. And some objected, as well, because exceptions have apparently not ever been made for other religions. Christian cadets have been told not to display crosses, for example.

The Citadel, which opened its doors in 1842, has prepared its cadets for military and civilian careers in three centuries.

The Citadel’s unique educational experience, combin[es] . . . rigorous academic preparation within a disciplined military environment . . . Citadel Cadets and graduates . . . serve our nation bravely, in the tradition of the citizen-soldier, participating in every conflict our nation has faced since [the Mexican] War, including . . .the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq. . . .

 The first African American Cadet, entered The Citadel in 1966 and the first women entered the South Carolina Corps of Cadets in 1996. Cadets from many foreign countries have added to the cultural diversity of the Corps of Cadets since the 1920s, when the first Chinese students arrived. These were followed by Cadets from Puerto Rico (prior to its becoming a commonwealth) in the late 1940s, Thai and Taiwanese Cadets in the 1960s and 1970s, and Jordanian and Iranian Cadets in the 1970s.[97] Today, the Citadel’s Corps of Cadets represents a rich and diverse group of young men and women from across America and many different foreign countries, intent on preparing themselves to be principled leaders in their chosen fields of endeavor.

The prospective student, who has not been identified, wished to undo American women’s centuries-long battle for equality by demanding a special dispensation to supplement her uniform with the traditional Muslim demi-shroud, often required of Muslim women who intend to live a natural life-span without being maimed, crippled, or horribly disfigured.

In Islamic lands,  hijab is a necessity for girls and women over the age of 5, as it identifies the wearer as the property of a Muslim man –father, uncle, husband,  brother, son, etc. –and not to be confused with “uncovered meat” that can be raped with impunity. Untold numbers of Muslim women and girls have been raped, beaten, burned, stoned, doused with acid, strangled, imprisoned and / or killed for not wearing the hijab -or whatever version of portable purdah is required of them by the Muslim men where they live.

Unsurprisingly, the parents of the young woman are considering legal action.

Equally unsurprisingly, the Islamic Defenders™ of Hamas-CAIR once again leapt into action to try to force Americans to accept the exigencies of a foreign, minority ideology:

The student cried after the commandant told her, said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations who spoke with the family Tuesday morning. “She told the commandant it wasn’t fair that she has to choose between practicing her faith and going to the Citadel,” he said.

She had worked very hard and had been focused on going to the Citadel for a long time, Hooper said. “That’s why she was so heartbroken,” he said.

She will not attend, he said.

“A complete denial was very shocking,” he said. They had expected their request to be granted. “The father said, ‘We live in a land of laws. These outdated traditions violate that law’ ” that protects religious freedom, Hooper said.

Oh please. “Outdated traditions” that won’t allow the imposition of 7th century foreign religious requirements on a 21st century woman in America?

O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies that they may thus be distinguished and not molested. (Sura 33:59)

And someone who cries because “it wasn’t fair” doesn’t sound like Citadel material.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan Stumps for Trump

In a surprise move, London’s newly-elected Mayor went to bat for the presumptive US  Republican presidential nominee today.



Mayor Sadiq Khan said Trump was making both Britain and America “less safe” and “playing into the hands of the extremists”. Well, he should know, since he numbers so many extremists among his friends.

[B]ack in 2004, Khan spoke  at a gender-segregated event entitled “Palestine — the suffering still goes on.” Also on the bill was Daud Abdullah of the Muslim Council of Britain; who once led a boycott of Holocaust Memorial Day; Ibrahim Hewitt, the chairman of Interpal, which the U.S. Treasury Department has designated a “global terrorist” organization for funneling money to Hamas; Muslim leader Azzam Tamimi, who has called for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state; Muslim cleric Suliman Gani, who has echoed the Qur’an (4:34) in saying that women should be “subservient” to men; Ismail Adam Patel of Friends of Al-Aqsa, who has claimed that “Hamas is no terrorist organization”; and Church of England cleric Stephen Sizer, who has blamed Israel for the 9/11 jihad terror attacks.

The ill-considered attacks on Trump were elicited by Trump’s suggestion that he would “make an exception” for the new mayor to his proposed ban on foreign Muslims entering the US. Judging by the response from the adherents of the religion of Osama Bin Laden and ISIS, any such exception would be a mistake.

The attacks also had the unintended side effect of reminding American voters that the President of the United States of America does not wear hijab.


Obama Adviser’s Damning Admission

L. TODD WOOD: Obama adviser admits lying to media to seal Iran deal

Ben Rhodes, President Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications, is highlighted in a recent piece by the New York Times which quotes Rhodes as admitting the Obama administration lied to the American people, Congress, and our allies in how they “spun” the Iran deal. The revelations are simply astonishing but not surprising. It seems… Continue reading

Rino Rampage

Now that the people have spoken, the RINOs are taking their ball and going home.

Leading the herd is Paul Ryan. Ryan, you’ll remember, is the person whose assumption of the House Speakership from “Cryin’ John” Boehner at first filled republicans with hope, but then subsided into surrender-as-usual. Ryan was asked by CNNs Jake Tapper if he would support Trump after Donald Trump’s victory in Indiana, which led to the “suspension” of the campaigns of both Ted Cruz and John Kasich.

“To be perfectly candid with you, Jake, I’m just not ready to do that at this point. I’m not there right now,” Ryan told CNN host Jake Tapper.

He continued: “I hope to, and I want to. But I think what is required is to unify this party. And I think the bulk of the burden on unifying the party will have to come from our presumptive nominee.”

Also not playing is presidential race loser Mitt Romney:

“I’m certainly going to be hoping that we find someone who I have my confidence in who becomes nominee. I don’t intend on supporting either of the major party candidates at this point,” he said.

And there is also failed presidential hopeful John McCain, who concedes that he will support Trump, now that “republicans have spoken” but laid the groundwork to blame Trump should he fail in his contest to win yet another re-election to the Senate. He said he may be in “the race of my life” because of Trump.

Failed former inevitable candidate Jeb! Bush said he won’t support Trump. Or Hillary either.

And of course, the man who epitomizes the RINO breed, Lindsey Graham said no to supporting Trump.

So that’s five — wait, no, sorry –FOUR votes that Donald Trump will just have to do without.

Rapist Migrant Picks Wrong Victim

An admitted rapist being held for his part in the gang rape of a Viennese student picked the wrong intended victim for his next attack. The allegedly 16-year-old refugee attacked a female warden in the  jail where he is being detained. But the warden, described as a  martial arts expert, promptly put him down and pinned him to the floor. He was carried back to his cell by her colleagues.

The alleged child migrant is one of three arrested following the rape of a 21-year-old student in the Praterstern Station in Vienna.  The three assailants, all alleged to be between 16 and 17 years old, are Afghan asylum seekers.

According to reports,

the trio were arrested after they had followed a 21-year-old student into the women’s toilets, and then used a coin to open the door lock while she was inside. They are accused of then pinning her down and raping her.

The victim immediately called for help, and the three asylum seekers were arrested near the station.

All three initially denied involvement, but have since all admitted to taking part. They were also positively identified by the victim.

The Praterstern Station area has been the location of a number of recent rapes and attacks by Muslim migrants, with a rape in January and an attempted rape in March.