The Daily Outrage from Sweden


There is news of yet another outrage from Sweden as it tries to cope with the self-inflicted wound of mass muslim immigration.

Ten Swedish police were reported to have fled for their lives after being trapped in a passageway by shrieking Muslim migrants. The migrants objected to the attempt by law enforcement to rescue a 10-year-old boy who had been repeatedly raped at a refugee center in Vasteras. The police were called in after staff at the center were unsuccessful in their attempts to rescue the child from the muslims.

Nothing says, “I’m a poor, desperate refugee who just wants a new start” like gang-raping a 10-year-old, and then attacking the police when they try to intervene.

The incident, which happened last Wednesday, was followed on Monday by the stabbing murder of a staff member at a refugee center in Molndal. The victim, 22-year-old Alexandra Mezher, was a social worker at the refugee center for unaccompanied minors. The perpetrator, age 15, has been charged with murder.

According to the Swedish Migration Agency, the number of threats and violent incidents at asylum facilities more than doubled from 2014 to 2015 as Sweden witnessed a record number of migrant arrivals. In 2014, there were 148 incidents and in 2015 that number more than doubled to 322.

The number of arson attacks targeting asylum shelters has also surged, with at least two dozen centres destroyed or damaged by fire last year.

Lena Nitz, the director of Sweden’s police union, said “It is obvious that the migrant situation is a great strain. It has become clear that the situation is completely unsustainable.”

Despite Sweden’s policy reversal in November of last year, which restricted migrant intake to the “EU minimum,” it is clear that the Swedish citizenry is still paying for their government’s  . . . generosity.


They’re Not Housebroken


Germany is attempting to “educate” its new migrants through a poster campaign. The posters show the new arrivals what is expected of them in the way of proper behavior in their new home. Included are instructions not to grope or molest the women, and not to defecate in the shower.


Do Syrians defecate in public showers in Syria?

I have never been to Syria, but none of my well-traveled friends has ever mentioned that there is a problem with public defecation there.

We are assuming, of course, that the approximately 1,000,000 new migrants to Germany are in fact refugees from war-torn Syria. And that the reason they are apparently relieving themselves on the floors of public showers in Germany is because they don’t know any better, and aren’t sure what is expected of them in their new European home.

And, of course, we can be sure that the reason they are molesting women -and children, it must be said, some as young as three years of age  -is because they simply haven’t been educated to know that this behavior is unacceptable.

Here in America, when one is considering adopting a dog from a shelter or the county pound, a major concern, if it is an adult dog, is whether or not the animal is housebroken. If the dog will spend at least part of its time indoors, it is essential that the animal be able to control its urges and not use the floor as a toilet. And  -at least as important -the animal must be taught not to try to mate with the coffee table, or hump the legs of family members or guests.

Good behavior is a must if one is welcoming a new animal into one’s home.

But let’s tell the truth: No one really believes that the reason the migrants are assaulting women and children, and relieving themselves in public showers or on trains is because they don’t know what is expected of them. They aren’t from Mars, and they have adapted to the use of smart phones well enough.


No, the reason they rape, and molest, and intimidate the native populations and their children; the reason they leave their excrement for someone else to clean up; the reason they left a trail of garbage and debris and human waste across Europe, all along their routes to the most generous countries to settle in; the reason they throw their trash off the balconies of their free accomodations in a foreign land, and taunt the police, and spit on their theft victims, and scream and shout and swear and lie, lie, lie when hauled into courts of law when finally charged with a crime; is because they are Islamic supremacists who are convinced of their own superiority to the “infidel” inhabitants of the European countries they are invading, and have nothing but contempt for their hosts.

That’s His Jihad


On Saturday, coinciding with the end of UN sanctions, the US lifted sanctions against Iran, swapped Iranian felons for American hostages,  and welcomed Iran into the elite club of nuclear powers.  No, Iran is not technically a nuclear power yet –it will be in a matter of months. And the over $100 billion in assets freed by sanctions relief will help immensely.

It was reported that

 . . . Iranian banks, including the Central Bank  . . . have returned to the international financial system, and once again can do business with the United States or move dollars around the world. Already on Sunday, the Central Bank announced that it had reconnected to the international SWIFT wire transfer network, from which it had been banned under sanctions.

. . . Iran is now free to move the $100 billion or so released from blocking orders in Japan, South Korea, India, China, and Turkey, and move it anywhere it pleases, including to terrorist networks. It can also use the money to buy weapons, ballistic missile parts, or nuclear-related equipment, as long as they don’t originate in the United States.

Foreign editor at ABC Jon Williams  says the US “offered clemency” to seven Iranians . . . and lifted fourteen Interpol “red notices” as part of the Iran deal. A red notice is an international alert used by police to communicate information about crimes, criminals and threats, to their colleagues elsewhere. It could be described as an international arrest warrant.

The Wall Street Journal reports that among the seven Iranians given clemency is one who pled guilty to a cyberattack against a US defense contractor. The U.S. also dropped extradition proceedings against the CEO of Iran’s state-owned airline, who is accused of helping smuggle weapons to the Syrian government.

The Obama administration had briefly threatened to impose new sanctions on Iran following Iran’s recent ballistic missile tests. But the new sanctions plan was delayed almost immediately,  when Iran’s foreign minister warned that it would derail negotiations for the release of the American hostages.


German Feminist says Rapes a Weapon of War

41qzmWpffCL__SL500_AA300_A leading German feminist has condemned the organized sexual assaults on New Year’s Eve as acts of Islamic terror. Alice Schwartzer is a prominent contemporary German feminist, who has also protested the wearing of Islamic headscarves in public. She is founder and publisher of the German feminist journal EMMA.

“After the events in Cologne I keep reading the so-called young feminists arguing that ‘rape is a German problem also’ . . .. But the assaults committed by Muslim migrants in Cologne and elsewhere on New Years Eve were of “a new quality, a completely different dimension” than the sexual violence committed by German men.

She argues that the mass rapes on New Year’s Eve were a form of “war strategy”. In her words:

“In all the wars the systematic rape of women is part of the war strategy. Because sexual violence against women reaches two people. First: Man breaks the women. Secondly, to humiliate their husbands. That would be really a controversial political dimension: Kalashnikovs, explosives belt and now sexual violence.”

In an interview with Die Welt, she also said that there are many in Germany who are “critical  . . . of so many migrants and refugees in Germany and their failure to integrate.” They “fear the racism accusation.” But that after Cologne, “this bubble has now burst”.

Schwarzer says that the “grotesque” contradictions in modern feminist discourse, namely the tendency to excuse Muslim violence against women, is a form of racism, and insisted that feminists should not “patronize” Muslims by excusing their intolerance and crimes.

“Political correctness should not prevent us from free thinking,” she said, “Because it’s not about people, but about ideology.”


The Savage Onslaught


Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.  –John Adams

On New Years Eve, at least hundreds and possibly over a thousand male Muslim immigrants and asylum-seekers assembled at pre-arranged locations, and assaulted women in their host countries. The assaults took place in several cities in Germany, in Austria, and in Sweden. Police report being attacked with bottles and fireworks, being taunted by violent perpetrators who tore up their residency cards and bragged of being invited in by Angela Merkel. The German media suppressed the information for four days.

Many have been eager to point out that European men rape women as well, that talking about the “race” of the perpetreators will only bolster the “Islamophobia” of the far-Right, that the unhappy events are being politicized against migrants.

Which cannot change the fact of the assaults, nor the fact that the perpetrators were Muslim migrants.

Question: Since when did it become the job of Western governments, law enforcement, and media to hide from the voting, tax-paying citizenry accurate reportage of what is happening in their own countries? Since when did it become the responsibility of government, police, and the media to shield Muslim immigrants from the consequences of their actions?

In a ridiculous act of self-delusion, women marched in Germany “Against sexism, Against racism.” It is as if they could not bear to assert  their own rights, or protest the violation of those rights, without also reassuring their assailants. They could not even entertain the idea that the assaults took place because the perpetrators are Muslim men.  And their victims are not.

There is even a name for it.

The [German] Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), the main investigative authority in Germany, said in a response to Die Welt newspaper it knows sexual harassment of women in public is widespread in Arab countries, and that this is exactly what happened on New Year’s Eve in Cologne. Collective harassment is translated as “taharrush gamea” (حرش جماعي).

Such crimes are committed by groups of young men… mostly when there are large gatherings of people, such as demonstrations. They range from sexual harassment to rape,” the BKA told Die Welt.

Earlier, German Justice Minister Heiko Maas urged authorities to investigate if the Cologne assaults were directly related to those in the other German cities of Berlin, Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Bielefeld during New Year’s celebrations.

“If such a horde gathers in order to commit crimes, it appears in some form to be planned,” the minister told Bild on Sunday. “Nobody can tell me that this was not coordinated or prepared.”

The BKA said the assaults “ranging from sexual harassment to physical abuse” were unknown in Germany until recently.

It would be comforting to believe that Muslim asylum-seekers are just interested in relocating to a place of peace, opportunity and prosperity; hoping to live in an atmosphere of  tolerance and mutual respect for both sexes and all orientations, with equality for all races and creeds.

But so far we’ve seen no evidence of that.

Revelry, Islamic Style

As revelers greeted the new year in Cologne, Germany, an estimated 1000 Muslim immigrants assembled at the train station, from which gathering point they sexually assaulted scores of women. In response, Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker proposed issuing online instructions  for the female citizenry, so they will be prepared for the inevitable sexual assaults in their future.

According to Mayor Reker:

“The women and young girls have to be more protected in the future so these things don’t happen again . . ..  This means they should go out and have fun, but they need to be better prepared, especially with the Cologne carnival coming up. For this, we will publish online guidelines that these young women can read through to prepare themselves.”

At the moment it remains unclear what preparations the mayor has in “mind” -leaning hard on the metaphorical. Here are a few possibilities:

  • Make sure you’re on the Pill
  • Wear clothing that can be easily removed without damage, so you’ll have something to cover yourself with, post-assault
  • Bring pads to absorb the blood and DNA evidence on your way to the hospital and / or police station
  • Have your (illegal) hand gun, and an extra clip or speed-loader, handy at all times
  • Remember to bring along your shoulder-mounted grenade launcher
  • Stay inside your armored personnel carrier

Later reports have indicated that Cologne was not the only German city where such mass sexual assaults took place, but that Muslim immigrant men spent New Year’s eve raping and otherwise assaulting women in a number of cities.

I’m sure there’s really nothing out-of-the-ordinary going on. Just ask European “feminists” -or as we would say, collaborators.

As reported by Breitbart, a German  woman identifying herself as Tanja insisted that

No one is talking about the fact that this is happening to women every day,”  . . .

“People are insisting on making this a political story, trying to shift the focus on pro or anti refugees. But in fact, no one is listening to what we have to say – the women – who suffered from this violence in the streets on a daily basis long before refugees even came here.

But the problem can be summed up in the words of British political activist Anne-Marie Waters, “It’s true, women are abused everywhere, but in most countries it’s against the law. In Islamic states, it is the law.”

And it seems like becoming the law wherever Muslims make their homes.



The Cologne police are reporting (Jan. 10) that the number of cases of New Year’s Eve violence has reached 516,  with 40% related to sexual violence.

In Austria, several women from Salzburg have reported being sexually assaulted on New Year’s eve. Police have arrested three men whom they describe as Syrian and Afghan nationals.

Hillary’s Woman Problem

Hillary Clinton has been catching some flak lately for her association with an oft-accused sexual predator. That would be her husband, disgraced and impeached former president Bill Clinton.

The problem most recently arose when Hill “brushed off” a “heckler” according to the Puff Ho. The “heckler” in question is actually  Republican New Hampshire State Representative Katherine Prudhomme-O’Brien, who repeatedly tried to raise the question of Bill Clinton’s sexual predations against female associates during a townhall meeting in New Hampshire  on Sunday.

Hillary responded in her best school-marm-with-a-stick-up-her-ass way, saying “you are very rude and I am never going to call on you. Neener neener neener,” at which point Rep. Prudhomme-O’Brien burst into tears and stumbled from the room, weeping uncontrollably.

The crowd of Hillary supporters leapt to their feet, applauding wildly, and shouting avowals of their willingness to lay down their lives for the Democrat hopeful, rather that listen to a single syllable of anything resembling a mild criticism of her alleged-rapist husband.

Okay, I exaggerate.

But luckily CNN’s Dan Merica can help us understand.

Clinton rolled out a plan to address campaign sexual assault (sic) in 2015, telling an audience in Iowa that rape victims “have the right to be believed.”

“Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault,” Clinton said. “Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed and we’re with you.”

But some, especially Republicans who are bothered by Bill Clinton’s alleged sexual impropriety, saw the comment as hypocritical.

And not only they, but all those other English speakers as well. Hypocritical is an understatement.

What Hillary Clinton really meant,  was “You have the right to be believed. Unless I am legally representing your assailant. Or am married to him.”

Concerning the former, it is not just that Hillary in 1975 defended an accused child-rapist against charges of rape, but that she did so by attacking the truthfulness and mental health of the rape victim, then 12 years old.

In a sworn affidavit aiming to coerce a psychiatric evaluation of the sixth-grade victim, Clinton during the case nearly 40 years ago called into question the girl’s emotional stability, arguing she had exhibited “a tendency to seek out older men and engage in… fantasizing.” She added, citing a child psychology expert that “children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents with disorganized families, such as the complainant, are even more prone to such behavior.”

And concerning the latter, here is a partial list of those accusing Billy Goat Clinton of sexual assault:

  • Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
  • Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) – rape
  • Elizabeth Ward Gracen – rape – quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
  • Regina Hopper Blakely – “forced himself on her, biting, bruising her”
  • Kathleen Willey (WH) – sexual assault, intimidations, threats
  • Sandra Allen James (DC) – sexual assault
  • 22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) – sexual assault
  • Kathy Bradshaw (AK) – sexual assault
  • Cristy Zercher – unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
  • Paula Jones (AR) – unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
  • Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
  • 1974 student at University of Arkansas – unwelcomed physical contact
  • 1978-1980 – seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
  • Monica Lewinsky – quid pro quo, post incident character assault
  • Gennifer Flowers – quid pro quo, post incident character assault
  • Dolly Kyle Browning – post incident character assault
  • Sally Perdue – post incident threats
  • Betty Dalton – rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
  • Denise Reeder – apologetic note scanned

As is well known, Hillary was at least partly responsible for the Clinton campaign’s policy of launching personal attacks against all accusers of the saintly Billy. So unless Hillary can find some way to shut down all discussion of the unpleasant topic (good luck with that), she will continue to be dogged with questions about the man she vowed to love, honor and whatever all those years ago. As a self-styled feminist running on the fact that she is a woman, she owes it to the voting citizenry to explain herself.